FAQ

How long has RTA been serving the industry?

The Railway Tie Association's predecessor organizations date back to the late 1880s. In 1919, RTA was formed as the National Association of Railroad Tie Producers and later renamed the Railway Tie Association in 1932. Since then, RTA has been in continuous service to the railroad, timber, and wood preserving industries.

Can I or my organization join RTA?

All Membership applications are subject to review by the RTA's Executive Committee. To see if you may qualify, please view the Membership Categories & Dues. If you decide to apply for membership, fill out the application and submit it for review. You will be informed by return email if your application has been accepted or if further information is needed.

I'm a member, how do I log in?

Details to come.

What is the RTA membership organizational makeup?

RTA Membership Breakdown

How many wood crossties are there per mile in the United States on average?

There are about 3,249 wood ties per mile based on 19.5-inch, on-center spacing.

How many total crosstie does that represent?

Approximately 450,000,000 in the United States.

Approximately how many miles of railroad track are currently in use in the United States?

Around 140,000 miles of freight rail track, according to the Federal Railroad Administration.

Approximately how many new wood, concrete, steel, and composite ties do the major railroads in the United States use each year?*

In 2018, the major railroads installed a total of 13,778,638 ties. Smaller railroads installed 2,366,845 ties, for a total of 16,145,483 ties used by all U.S. Railroads

Of the 13,778,638 ties installed by the major railroads:

• 13,388,897 ties were new wood ties.
• 111,073 ties were second-hand wood ties.
• 278,668 ties were new ties other than wood.

In 2018, the short line and regional railroads reported installing 2,366,845 ties:

• 2,101,418 ties were new wood ties.
• 95,028 ties were second-hand wood ties
• 163,836 ties were switch or bridge ties.
• 6,563 ties were new ties other than wood.

For a complete view and forecast of tie use, see our market outlook article in Crossties magazine.

*Note, these statistics are for the major railroads in the United States, excluding exports and Canada and Mexico. These numbers are based on R-1 Reports and survey responses from the Class I and short line railroads and may not accurately represent actual production and purchases of ties.

How many railroad ties typically constitute a carload?

Gondola cars come in a variety of shapes and sizes, but you would safe using the following averages for 7"x9" x 8'6" crossties:

• Small Gondola Cars: 400/Car
• Large Gondola Cars: 600/Car

The AAR loading rules stipulate that no more than half of the thickness of the top layer of ties can stick above the top of the car after loading. Smaller gondola might be used for 106 LB rail lines. If trucks were used instead, the amount would be reduced to 190-200 ties per load, depending on size and average used tie weight.

• Center beam cars can carry 750 ties
• Some railroads use supersized gondolas that can carry 750 ties

See this article about gondola car loading safety in the March/April 2019 issue of Crossties magazine.

Where can I find more information and a map of railroads in the United States?

The Association of American Railroads and the American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association both offer a wealth of information. Check for a map of the Class I railroads by name and the short lines in general HERE.

What is the typical size of mainline railroad ties?

• Standard Ties = 7” x 9” x 8.5’ or 9’ long (mostly 8.5’ --- some 7x8 and 6x8 also in use)
• Bridge Ties = AREMA Standard is no smaller than 10' long by 8" wide.

Where are details about the dimensions of ties?

Please see an online version of RTA's Specifications booklet.

How far apart are ties laid?

Standard spacing is 19.5 inches on center

When a grade of a railroad tie is specified, does grade refer to the quality of a tie or its size?

See the comparison of grade and industrial grade (IG) ties HERE.

What wood species are used for ties, and where did that wood come from?

While some softwood species (approximately 4–6% of the total) are still used for crossties and bridge ties, the vast majority of ties produced today are hardwoods, primarily sourced from Eastern and Midwestern hardwood forests.

The specific mix of species varies by application and sourcing location, but a general rule of thumb is 50-60% oak and hickory and 40-50% other mixed hardwood species.

The chart below outlines the allowable species under current standards. Species marked with an asterisk are more commonly used, while those without an asterisk are permitted but typically used in limited quantities or not used at all:

The complete list of allowable species as well as detailed discussions of ties is available in the Tie Guide and the RTA Specifications brochure.

Contact end users of the crossties (treating plants and railroads) in your area before sawing to determine their current needs.

Get the new Tie Grading App on iPhone and Android with specifications and photos.

What percent of the railroad tie market in the United States uses wood ties?

Wood maintains a 90-93% share of the market for ties installed in North America. Wood not only has certain desirable performance properties that make it ideal for a wide variety of track applications, but initial and long-term life cycle economics of wood ties is one of the most important reasons that wood is the material of choice for railroad ties. The paper entitled Comparative Crosstie Unit Value and Costs gives more details on the economics of wood compared to alternate materials.

What are the other materials used for railroad ties?

Other materials used for ties include concrete (about 6.5% market share) and steel or plastic/composite ties (0.5% share or less).

How many crossties does the industry produce each year?

Currently, the industry has the capacity to produce well over 24 million crossties annually. The greatest production was just over 26 million ties in 2015. Today, tie production stands at just over 19 million ties. For the most recent articles on this subject, please see the latest January/February and September/October issues of Crossties in the publications section of Crossties magazine. These articles provide survey and historical data along with annual forecasts of tie usage and demand.

How do costs compare between wood and other types of ties?

Based on several Zeta-Tech studies, wood ties generally have a lower cost per mile per MGT than any of the alternate tie configurations, except for severe curvature high-density applications. Since the advent of dual treatments, wood ties used in wet climate applications now perform similarly in moderate or dry locations, as described below and in the linked paper.

In general, for a moderate-density tangent track of the order of 25 MGT per year located in a moderate climate zone of the US, wood tie costs ($/mile/MGT) are 60 to 80% of concrete tie track costs, 70 to 75% of plastic (composite) ties, and 80 to 85% of steel tie track costs.

For moderate density moderate curvature track (25 MGT per year) located in a moderate climate zone of the US, wood tie costs ($/mile/MGT) are of the order of 65 to 85% of concrete tie track; 70 to 80% of plastic (composite) ties, and 80 to 90% of steel tie track costs.

For dry climates, the wood tie costs represent a corresponding smaller percentage of the costs of alternate tie types; for wet climates, they represent a correspondingly higher percentage of the costs of alternate tie types. Click here for information on Comparative Crosstie Unit Value & Costs.

Do you disclose the companies that you survey for the monthly purchases report?

The reporters are members of RTA and comprise 99.9% of all ties produced in North America. We do not disclose our members’ names to non-member companies. This is not a survey but rather data generated through our monthly member reporting process which is a compliance requirement to be a member. Please note that this report is subject to become subscription-based and not available to the general public.

Why did RTA change the way it reports monthly purchases?

The Purchases Report is a calculated data point based on production and changes in inventory. Because members do physical inventory counts that periodically require significant adjustments to their reported data, monthly purchases can vary in a manner that is hard for some readers to appreciate. Without a full understanding of this and how members procure and manufacture treated ties that must air-dry for months before treating, short term/monthly data points, which could affect investment guidance, is not only imprudent to focus on, but also could lead to an unwise analysis of member performance. RTA decided to make the change described below* beginning November 2016 to present the data in a format that suggests using the report’s discussion on the monthly data in a manner that does not emphasize inventory adjustments that may be required following physical counts.

*From November 2016 onwards, RTA uses a 3-month moving average for reporting on inventory, which affects the calculated values of purchases. In this way, any exaggerations that might be manifest in monthly purchase data due to regular inventory counts by members are not emphasized.

What is the history of treating wood ties?

The crosstie industry began to employ pressure treating as a means of prolonging tie life beginning in the mid-1800s. The first crossties were treated in 1838 with an infusion of bichloride of mercury and laid on the Northern Central railroad in Maryland. The first permanent treating facility began operations in 1848 in Lowell, Massachusetts using alternately bichloride of mercury and chloride of zinc. Tie treatments continue to evolve today with new research and methods. HERE is an interesting letter from in 1895 suggesting the use of coal tar (creosote) to prolong the life of ties. Treating wood ties in the United States began in earnest in the early part of the 20th century. It took several decades for treating to become universal. Our records show that in the 1940s approximately 10% of wood ties were still untreated. You may see the history of Class 1 wood crosstie insertions since 1921 HERE.

What types of wood preservatives are used to pressure treat wood crossties?

Most hardwood crossties produced in North America today are pressure treated with creosote or creosote solutions. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has approved and registered creosote for this industrial application. Other approved standardized preservatives include Ammoniacal Copper Zinc Arsenate (ACZA) Copper Naphthenate (CuN) and Pentachlorophenol although Penta has not been used by railroads in decades. Some producers also use a dual treatment system where ties are treated with borate compounds before a second treatment with creosote. The borates diffuse throughout the hard-to-treat heartwood of many species and provide additional protection for wood used in high decay areas. In January 2010, the AWPA approved the use of ACZA as an accepted wood preservative for railroad ties. For example, Douglas fir is a strong, plentiful species, well-suited for use as ties, but not readily treatable with standard preservatives. Tests of ACZA-treated Douglas fir ties have shown low corrosivity and excellent spike-holding characteristics. ACZA enables the wood to resist termite damage and fungal decay and has been found to reduce flame spread in wood timbers.

How far does creosote penetrate?

Some species treat nearly 100% while in others only the sapwood treats easily. In refractory (hard to treat) species, many railroads use borates in a dual treatment process to protect the heartwood.

What benefits are there to using creosote as a treatment?

This analysis by Stephen T. Smith, P.E. discusses the economic, environmental, and societal benefits of creosote treatment.

What are the other approved treatments for hardwood ties?

98% of all wood crossties produced in the US and Canada are treated with creosote or creosote and oil blends. In addition to creosote, Pentachlorophenol and Copper Naphthenate (CuN) are approved preservatives for hardwood ties by the American Wood Protection Association (AWPA). ACZA is now also approved for Douglas fir and hardwood ties. CCA (copper chrome arsenate) is not recommended for hardwoods but may sometimes be used for certain Southern Yellow Pine timbers and ties.

Generally, CuN is applied with lighter oil carriers than creosote that may not provide the same extent of weather-proofing properties as the heavier creosotes. CuN is applied with oils that have lower flash points than creosote, some typical processing steps used when treating with creosote alone (sterilizing the ties under high heat to condition the wood and eliminate decay fungi that may have begun to grow while the wood is air-drying before processing) cannot be done. It is assumed that CuN would be most effective in hardwood ties when used in high decay hazard areas if the ties were dual-treated with a borate pre-treatment. Mississippi State University has conducted studies on dual treatment with CuN which you can find HERE. Nisus Corporation has assumed the EPA registration for CuN and built a manufacturing facility in Knoxville, TN, that will fuel more widespread use of CuN. At least five treating companies now offer ties or timbers treated with CuN for railroad use.

Borate compounds are now used in dual treatment processes for roughly 7 to 7.5 million of the 22+ million or so ties produced per year. Over the years of testing (50+ documented years now for creosote - see the 1958 cooperative study) creosote has proven to be the most efficacious and cost-effective wood preservative for hardwood ties. It has significant weatherproofing properties and is an excellent preservative for hardwood species.

Some wood species are refractory (hard-to-treat), and the heartwoods of those species are almost impenetrable by any wood preservative except borate compounds that diffuse through the wood over time. For these refractory species destined for high decay areas, it has now become relatively common practice to use borates as a pre-treatment to protect the wood before processing with creosote. Borate dual-treatment protects the entire cross-section of the wood tie, providing excellent service life even in high biological-hazard service conditions.

Each preservative system has its place in the wide variety of railroad applications and weather conditions in North America. RTA is continually researching and testing other systems, but none are currently in use other than those mentioned here.

What is RTA doing to research alternate preservatives?

RTA is working in conjunction with AAR to determine the relative effectiveness of alternative tie treatments with the ongoing Alternative Wood Protection Research Project (AWPRP) at Mississippi State University. The objectives of the project include determining the relative biological durability to decay fungi and subterranean termites of crossties commercially treated with existing and alternative preservatives exposed side-by-side in a replicated test on a site in AWPA Hazard zones 4 and 5, to determine the effectiveness of treatments against Formosan termites, to determine the corrosivity of alternative preservatives, and to determine the tie dimension stability effects of alternative treatments.

How can I contact manufacturers of pressure-treated wood crossties?

Access to the full RTA membership directory is available only to association members. You may apply for membership and if accepted, you will be able to access the full directory online. If you are not eligible for membership, RTA staff will attempt to facilitate members contacting you. Send us an email, and we will forward it to the appropriate contacts. Please be as specific as possible and include full contact information, including your name, company name, phone, email, and physical address information. Inquiries should be of a serious business nature and will only be forwarded if the intent of the inquiry will further the goals and business interests of our membership.

Are treatment facilities clustered in certain regions of the United States

Approximately 46 North American treating plants are geographically located near the hardwood resource and are accessible to the major railroads by rail. This necessarily means that a vast majority are east of Dallas and south of the Great Lakes. There are a few commercially important plants north and west of this area.

Is there any information about worker exposure to creosote-treated ties?

In conjunction with the Creosote Council and the Railway Tie Association, AAR met with EPA on September 26, 2003, as part of the re-registration process for creosote. The key point is that railroad workers do not manually handle crossties. Virtually all crossties are handled and installed by mechanized equipment. Workers who do come into contact with creosote-treated crossties are required to wear long-sleeve shirts and gloves to protect them from exposure. You may get further information at the Creosote Council's website.

Do ties need to be treated differently in different areas of the US?

The American Wood Protection Association publishes the map below to show how the deterioration of untreated wood is affected by geography. Some ties used in decay zones marked as high or severe historically have exhibited some reduction in service life due to biological deterioration. The introduction of borate technology as part of a dual treatment system has changed this paradigm. Now even hard-to-treat species should provide service life rivaling easy-to-treat species in these areas. (See above information on approved treatments for hardwood ties.)

AWPA decay zones

When incising is specified, the material shall be incised before yarding and seasoning to reduce checking, or if dry before treatment on four sides, with incisor not more than 7/32 inch thick to the pattern shown in the figure below. In pieces 5 inches or thicker, the incisions shall be 3/4 inch deep. In pieces less than 5 inches but more than 2 inches thick, they shall be 3/4 inch deep in the edges but only 1/2 inch deep in the sides. Incising of pieces 2 inches and thinner is not recommended. Patterns slightly different are not objectionable if machines constructed before 1940 are used.

Incising Specs

What is the annual replacement rate of crossties in the United States for the last 10 years?

3.0%. This translates to an average life in the track of between 33 and 42 years.

How big is the market for recycling and utilization of used railroad ties in the USA and Canada?

Approximately 20-22 million wood ties are replaced each year in these countries. A majority are already recycled as landscape ties or disposed of as fuel in co-generation facilities. The number that may be disposed of in approved landfills is not known accurately, but could be as many as 3- 4 million. More details are available in our 2015 Wood Crossties Disposal Survey.

How are wood crossties disposed of after their useful life in track?

Wood crossties have many recycling and disposal options. These two publications are the best source of information, Management of Used Treated Wood Products and its companion Addendum For the Western United States. Please note that California and other western states have additional requirements under certain circumstances and you can consult the Western Wood Preservers Institute for the most up-to-date information. Crossties are also used for landscaping timbers and a significant quantity of ties are burned in approved co-generation plants to produce electricity and gas. Biochar, a carbon soil additive, is another sustainable use for used crossties. More information on this is available under the heading Why Wood Crossties?

You can find additional information on topics such as the safe disposal of used crossties and special regulations here.

• 2019 California Treated Wood Waste Confirmed Landfill List
• Alternative Ad Brochure
• Creo Treater Letter Sept. 2012
• Disposal of Discarded Wood Railroad Crossties
• Evaluation of Polycyclic Cromatic Hydrocarbon Migration
• Kenn Brooks Paper on PAH
• Management of Used Treated Wood Products
• Review of Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
• Treated Wood Waste Management Fact Sheet

How do I know if a landfill requires a special permit for used tie disposal? 

Landfill rules for ties vary from very restrictive to very loose. It is a state-by-state and often a county-by-county determination/rule-making process. Some states are so restrictive that you must perform a TCLP chemical analysis of the ties, plus provide a chain of ownership manifest before landfilling. In other states/counties, ties can be disposed of very easily in non-lined C&D landfills. A few locales require cutting ties to 4’ before accepting them.

The only way to know for certain is to contact the landfill in question and ask them about their requirements. Please note that if you run across a landfill that says ties are a hazardous material, that is incorrect (although you may have to prove it with a TCLP test). If that specific landfill is in a state that does not require TCLP tests, you may want to alert us so we can provide follow-up. More info on California wood waste management is HERE.

What types of tie data are available for parties interested in using ties for cogeneration facilities?

According to a reliable source, here is the story on "average" used ties on an annual basis covering a population of ~6,000,000+ ties

• The mix of landscape to fuel ties: about 30-35% of any Class 1 used tie population are landscape quality (regardless of what is done with them)
• New tie weight is ~235 lbs for 7x9-8'6”
• Used Landscape Ties ~190 lbs for same
• Used Fuel Ties ~143 lbs for same
• Average weight if landscape ties are put in with fuel ties 159 lbs per 7x9-8'6"
• Average weight loss ~33%
• Fuel ties average 8,000 BTUs/lb
• Landscape ties average upwards of 12,000 BTUs/lb

What regulations govern the burning of railroad ties for fuel?

The latest EPA ruling is that railroad ties are a non-waste fuel and are classified as non-hazardous secondary materials for use in combustion units effective March 9th, 2016. See the complete final rule in the Federal Register here.

The rule for creosote/borate and copper naphthenate/borate ties has also been changed and appeared in the Feb. 7, 2018.

Is it safe to burn treated ties?

Burning creosote wood in EPA approved facilities has been done for many years and is a widely accepted practice. RTA does not have a publication speaking to the details of what requirements there are for specific facilities since the permitting practice varies from state to state, at least in the US. An update on the EPA Solid Waste Rule from 1-13-15 for information only can be found here.

How can I contact with organizations that deal with environmentally friendly treated crosstie disposal?

Contact our office by phone at 770-460-5553 or email us and we will put you in touch with our recycling companies.

Tie spacing is not amenable to walking, is this intentional to keep people off the tracks?

The spacing between ties is optimal from an engineering and maintenance standpoint. The fact that it makes walking uncomfortable is just a bonus, as walking on railroad tracks is both illegal and dangerous.

Please look at this information from Operation Life Saver and remember that injury and death due to trespassing on railroad tracks are preventable.

Does RTA have any information on the sustainability of the wood crosstie?

Please see the Railway Tie Association Sustainability Verification Certificate which outlines how RTA members work to ensure sustainability for wood crossties.

What are the nails with letters and numbers on them you can find around railroad tracks and in some ties?

They are called date nails. See "Date Nail History" article for more information.

I came across some old ties that are currently being used as fence posts. They all have S-shaped bands hammered into both ends of the tie. Do you know what these are called and what they are used for?

The S-shaped bands are called S-Irons and were once applied to ties to minimize end splitting. Some are still in track today, but railroads now use gang-nail style end-plates to control end splitting.

What about white ash that is infested with the Emerald Ash Borer that has spread to OH, IN, IL PA and looks like it will go further?

Ash is an appropriate species for railroad ties. However, it seems that the EAB may be with us for some time. The best preventative is to minimize transport distances of the raw logs with bark still intact. To transfer any Ash product (logs, crossties, lumber, chips or bark mulch) out of an infested county, you must have the proper paperwork and inspections from the USDA. It is best to have the raw logs processed into ties or lumber as close to the source as possible. For updated information see the Emerald Ash Borer Information Website.